I mean it.
Why must Google
feel the need to constantly - to continuously update and 'modernise' their
sites?
I logged onto
YouTube today and did not know how to find the comments on a user's channel. In
fact, I did not even know how to find the list of their videos.
What's the
difference between 'Video', 'Feed' and 'Featured' anyway? This is where the
videos are located - but what is the necessity of categorising them into three
sub-menus? Isn't it enough to have one Videos tab, and put all the videos in
the one place like the old YouTube?
What was wrong with the old YouTube?
It seems these social media giants feel a nagging pressure on the backs of their necks to consistently 'stay with the times' and make their sites look fancy-schmancy with millions of different features. Perhaps it's one big competition on whose got the most technology. And brains.
It seems these social media giants feel a nagging pressure on the backs of their necks to consistently 'stay with the times' and make their sites look fancy-schmancy with millions of different features. Perhaps it's one big competition on whose got the most technology. And brains.
And I'm not trying
to be slanderous here. I'm simply making known the frustrations of a social
networking user to be continuously adapting to these types of changes. Websites
should fulfil the purpose for which they were created. Leave Google as a
search engine. Leave YouTube as a video-sharing site and leave Facebook as a
social networking site.
Now, I may be
wrong, but surely the simplicity of these sites when they first started out was
what made them so globally successful.
Does anyone
remember Myspace?
8 out of 10 could easily say we had one some four or five years ago. And what about now?
8 out of 10 could easily say we had one some four or five years ago. And what about now?
Myspace has 30
million users worldwide.
Facebook has 845
million users worldwide.
Back when Myspace
was at its height, Facebook didn't even exist. In fact, when it came about only
a couple of people that I knew had gotten it. And I refused to make the switch.
Why should I, when Myspace was so awesome? And simple.
It only took a
year or so for everyone to abandon their Myspace accounts and jump to the new
fad which was Facebook. Facebook became like a virtual human magnet.
Now, the reasons
for this have been widely argued by professionals and business-people alike
time and time again. Many of them cannot answer their own questions and come to
the conclusion that Facebook is simply the 'in' thing to have.
As a personal user
of both Myspace and Facebook, I can add some analyses into this equation.
Just as Facebook
began beating Myspace in the march to the finish line of popularity, I noticed
that Myspace began changing rather radically. The entire site got an
overhaul, and your profile was now able to be customized in an array of ways -
from personalization of theme, to personalization of the song you had displayed
to personalization of core layout principles which made up your page.
Facebook, at the
time, was basically a piece of ugly white canvas through which people could
communicate.
If you ask me, no
friggin wonder Facebook overshot Myspace by almost 100%.
Myspace later went
on to add sub-Myspace sites which included Myspace Celebrity, Myspace Fashion,
Myspace Movies, Myspace Television, Myspace Games, Myspace Twats, etc. That
last one was a joke if you hadn't noticed.
Myspace used to be
known as the prime social networking site, and is now known as a 'social
entertainment destination'.
On that note,
Facebook's piece of ugly white canvas is not so ugly anymore. They, too, began
adding features of astronomical purpose to their site. And I don't blame them;
advancement is advancement. Facebook now has many features, the most
significant of which may be the new Timeline. This feature allows posts to be
categorized by time and date, much like blogging sites. It also allows users to
personalize the theme of their page, and how it looks. Sound familiar?
I am in no way opposed to the idea of advancing social networking sites to keep up with technology. I think it shows great innovation and allows us all to move forward in the digital age.
I am in no way opposed to the idea of advancing social networking sites to keep up with technology. I think it shows great innovation and allows us all to move forward in the digital age.
But for God's
sake, keep it simple. Not all of us are computer engineers.
Perhaps we should
be thinking in Leonardo da Vinci's words,
"Simplicity
is the ultimate sophistication."
It goes something like this:
It goes something like this:
-Dahlia
No comments:
Post a Comment